Photographic Celibacy – Not Studying Other Photographer’s Work
Some of you are familiar with my admittedly odd practice of not studying other photographer’s work. It’s something I’ve been doing for about 2 years now and it’s always been met with curiosity, dismay and sometimes even a little hostility. I mentioned it again in the last blog and it was suggested by my friend and fantastic b&w photographer, Lance Keimig, that this might be a good discussion topic. I agreed and so here we are.
Let me explain why I began this unconventional practice and then I’d love to hear your thoughts on it. However, this might be a very one-sided discussion as I’ve not met many people who agree or appreciate what I’m doing. So if I’m the lone man on this issue, some of you might need to side with me just so we can have a two-way discussion!
To start with I’d like to point out that I’ve never suggested that others should adopt this practice, I’ve just described what I was doing. However I recognize that when one writes publicly, your words can come across as advice.
Several years ago I came to the hard realization that I was not creating with my own vision, but rather I was copying the style and even the images of my revered childhood hero’s. The full impact of this hit home when I was attending a Portfolio Review at the Center in Santa Fe. One of the reviewers said that it appeared I was trying to copy Ansel Adams and Edward Weston’s style. When I responded that I was, because I loved their work, he very bluntly pointed out that Ansel already did Ansel and that no one was going to it better than Ansel. At the time those were very hard words to hear, but over the next year I came to agree with him and it started me on the quest to create with my own vision.
As I analyzed how I was working, I came to the conclusion that when I studied another photographer’s work, I was imprinting their style onto my conscious and subconscious mind. And then when I photographed a scene, I found myself imitating their style rather than seeing it through my own vision. To overcome this tendency I decided to stop looking at the work of other photographer’s, as much as was practically possible.
So for the last two years I’ve tried it; I’ve not read my B&W Magazines, poured over my LensWork or sought out great photography on the web. It’s been hard, and at times I’ve felt like a celibate monk working at a nude beach!
Has it worked? Yes, it has had a positive affect on my art and I feel that my images are increasingly “me” and not just copies of someone else’s work. I’m making progress and when I think of my projects such as The Ghosts of Auschwitz, The Lone Man and the Harbinger series (new image above) I’m pleased with my “direction.”
I don’t expect to continue this practice forever. Once I’ve better developed my vision and have become more disciplined, I’ll return to enjoying black and white photography which has been my first love since the age of 14.
But for me, at this time, and for where I’m at creatively; photographic celibacy is helping!
Cole
P.S. I’ve just had an experience that reinforces my position on this issue. One of my images will be in a new book entitled “Why Photographs Work” by George Barr. Last night we were given a link to review the images chosen and as I looked for mine I came across an image by Brian Kosoff that just stopped me dead in my tracks. It’s entitled “Three Crosses” and it’s the first image on his home page. Do you want to guess where my mind has been all day today as I drove around town? I’ve been looking for telephone poles in patterns so that I can imitate his work!
Bad, bad Cole.
January 7th, 2010 at 6:12 am
Here are my 2 cents, take them as you will. I personally enjoy looking at others work. For me it gets my creative juices flowing. I see things that others have done and it gives me new ideas of my own. Not copying there work but developing my own. By looking at the works of other photographers I am able to better refine my own style. If that doesn’t work for you, and you need to be in a vacuum with only your images and works than that’s what you have to do. To each is there own. But, and there is always a but, if more people adopted your stance on studying others work than not to many people would be seeing Cole Thompson photographs. At least the stuff that you are submitting to photography magazines and books. Not too many people would be visiting your blog and encouraging you along in your artistic journey as a photographer.
Matt
January 7th, 2010 at 7:36 am
Well Cole, some of us need to be inspired by looking at others work and some can truely create their own.
I don’t really think it matters either way. Its not that someone else is right or wrong just because they disagree with you, it just is what it is.
Its an interesting post. I’m still looking for that photography rule book, I’ve been looking a long time, but can’t seem to locate it. If you ever find it can you let me know
January 7th, 2010 at 8:08 am
I can certainly see your point Cole, and if it’s working for you, then by all means continue. I’m sure that sooner or later you’ll get over that hump, and stop denying yourself guilty pleasures.
I’ve been personally dismayed in recent years by the huge number of Michael Kenna impersonators that has sort of evolved into a genre all of it’s own: “The square black and white long exposure at the water’s edge, frequently using ND filters photographer.” Certainly the first of these photographer’s were inspired by Kenna, or maybe David Fokos, but now there are so many of these guys out there that it’s hard to distinguish between any of the photographers doing this work. Fortunately, I think it’s peaked and is waning. Fortunately- Kenna has moved on and is creating new and different work.
Speaking of MK, he’s another monk on a nude beach. I don’t know if he avoids looking at other’s work, but he certainly works in a self-imposed vacuum, and is one of the most creative and prolific photographers of our time.
He has always been an inspiration to me, and while we both photograph at night, I don’t think my work would ever be confused with his. I’ll never stop looking at his prints- viewing them brings out a strong emotional response the same way that music can for me.
January 7th, 2010 at 8:31 am
Cole, so far it looks like 3 to 1, but it’s not a most-points-win contest! Whatever works for the artist should be the criteria, If it’s a copy, most folsk will see it, and discard the copy.
Shalom,
January 7th, 2010 at 9:03 am
There are no universally right answers to any question regarding how one chooses to create art. The right answer is what works for you. Clearly you have found what works now for you, and you are keeping an open mind regarding others and yourself in the future. To me that is the perfect approach; find your own way but recognize that it is not ‘the’ way. Viewing others work is critical to my development as an artist for the joy, inspiration and instruction it provides. While I strive to create images that express a unique vision, if I connect with one of my images that is similar in style to another artist, so be it. The connection is everything to me. That said, I would hesitate to present such images publicly. In closing, you cannot know if your vision is unique without being aware of what others are doing; you cannot possibly know what everyone else is doing. So do what works for you!
January 7th, 2010 at 10:35 am
I agree with you.
I sometimes find myself doing exactly as you describe, and it sometimes seems to me that other photographers with whom I am acquainted occasionally do the same, too.
Sometimes it is good to stand apart from the crowd, to break the rules, and in doing so, to develop a new way of seeing and of capturing what you see.
January 7th, 2010 at 3:01 pm
I totally relate to your perspective about viewing other’s work. I worry that I can become “caught” by the influence of their work… especially when it impresses me. But in reality I have been unable to force myself away from viewing that work anyway. I instead have tried to accept the influence that inevitably seems to arise and try to find ways to reconfigure my outcome into something more unique. Can’t really tell whether I succeed with this approach of “growing” from the influence or just don’t see the mimicry in the end.
January 7th, 2010 at 4:08 pm
Some good thoughts my friends. I had to laugh at Matt’s point; what if everyone did this, no one would be looking at my art! I’ve had other’s point this out also.
Lance brought up a good point, how once a certain style or subject becomes famous, there are soon many people copying that style. We all have seen the “Kenna Kopying” (I’ve been guilty of that) and he’s just one example. A friend, Camille Seaman, broke onto the scene a few years back with her fantastic images of icebergs. Now there are about 10 iceberg photographers out there.
However, now not everyone who produces similar images are copying, sometimes parallel work is in development at the same time. Lance pointed out to me another photographer who has images very similar to my “Lone Man” series entitled “The Man and the Sea.” Marcin Stawiarz and I have communicated about this and neither of us were aware of the other’s work. Marcin said to me:
“…so it happens, even if the concepts are similar I think we got two completely different ways to show that.”
Brooks Jensen wrote an article last year entitled “Fellow Travellers” about this very subject after both Larry Blackwood and I submitted a very similar portfolio on Grain Silos. Sometimes similar work just develops independently.
Bill brought up the subject of uniqueness, and how you cannot know if your work is unique if you are not looking to see what others are doing. I know I’ve used the word “unique” before, but to be more precise, I am seeking to produce work that is true to my vision even more than I seek it to be unique. To me it’s clear that you can be true to your vision and yet your work is not “unique.”
But of all the comments, I completely agree with Will, who completely agrees with me! (smile)
Cole
January 7th, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Gotcha Cole, yes you can be unique to your vision and yet look similar to others…the point is…it is what you define as yours that makes it yours. Sometimes I love this blog! Always love your work.
January 8th, 2010 at 8:06 pm
I know so little about the “art” of photography, but as far as “studying” another’s style, it seems we did that in History in high school. There was nothing wrong with it then, and I don’t see a problem with it now. How else does one develop one’s own particular style in any type of art? You cannot cut yourself off from the privilege of enjoying the art of others, and if it impresses you in a positive way, I do not see the dilemma. It would seem to me to be the highest form of compliment. Knowing what I know of you, Cole, I believe in YOU, and what comes from your eye through the lens is something altogether unique. Don’t be rattled by such silly notions of whether or not to study the photographic art of others. After all, what is a mentor anyway?
Blessings,
Abbey
January 9th, 2010 at 6:45 am
In my past life, I was a professional jazz drummer (over 25 years) and there was always a few musicians who made it a point to not study other, even famous, musicians. I could sort of understand it in those days, but personally felt the need to try to glean the essence of what made great players great. But, ultimately fell prey to sounding like them (as much as possible), and not having my own voice. However, in later years, I did get more of a personal sound when I played “me.” Not as easy as it sounds.
I’m finding that with the mind numbing amount of great photographers and the software knowledge needed to bring digital images to realization, I’m getting a bit overwhelmed. I found that I began chasing other photographers whom I felt had more together than I, jumping from one photographer to another, and not focusing on my own work. The parallel between this aspect of photographic insecurity and musical insecurity are identical and manifest themselves in the same way.
A friend forwarded your article to me and it was like all the stress melted away as I was reading it. I agree with you completely and have decided to pursue my own vision, undistracted by others. Occasional impressions from others work can certainly inspire us to get out there and make images, but as in the end of your article, we wind up looking to replicate the image that inspired us.
Bottom line, there would be more originality and artistic integrity in the world if we all myopically pursued our own vision, largely unaffected by others. And I returned to this journey as of yesterday.
January 9th, 2010 at 5:50 pm
Hi Cole:
Tony is right on. Having been a musician myself, he his bring out exactly the two factors. Learning your instrument or tool of the trade, then learning your own sound or self expression.
It is not about being Professional trained (schooled), it is learning how to express yourself through your Instrument. You need to step away from the pack and develop your own sound or way of expression. And it takes time. I personal commend you for make such a step forward.
Jeff
January 9th, 2010 at 10:31 pm
Tony, Jeff; thanks for the additional and well expressed thoughts on this.
January 11th, 2010 at 2:03 pm
Lucky for me, I guess, but I love looking at the work of others (yours included) but have absolutely no interest in copying, imitating, or being influenced by others to do something similar. I’ve never been much of a lemming and have always disliked “bandwagoning” (what Lance mentions about all the Kenna knock-off’s). This has left me with no choice but to purse the way *I* see the world.
Interesting post, Cole!
January 14th, 2010 at 1:43 am
Hi Cole, I’ve nominated you for a Kreativ Blogging Award. Visit my photoblog to get it (http://silaartphoto.blogspot.com/).
January 21st, 2010 at 11:58 am
Interesting topic which has clearly led to some thoughtful commentary.
For me, the key point in your explanation is that this is intended to be a temporary exile. I do think there are periods in our artistic development when it is beneficial to look at the work of others and times when it is not. Even though we may intend not to be influenced by what we see, it is almost impossible not to be, so we open ourselves to that when we look at others.
Certainly upon finding yourself overly influenced by others, your solution of not looking seems reasonable. Once you feel more solid in doing what is uniquely yours, it is good to return from this celibacy. I suspect over one’s entire career there can be periods of back and forth like this as one soaks up inspiration and ideas from others and then processes it, perhaps in total isolation, into a unique vision. Then it’s back up for air and the cycle repeats.
January 21st, 2010 at 1:18 pm
Hi Cole. A voice from the past. I agree with you and also there is no right or wrong here at all. However, now that there are other names within the emails I have to go and look up those folks.
I have such a bad memory that I can look at another’s work and be stunned by it, but I may or may not be adopting their style. Maybe by osmosis? And, how can I stop looking at your work? I am not a BW photographer at this point, because all I see is color and it zings me. Great discussion.
Eileen
January 21st, 2010 at 6:11 pm
Great topic…
I like your presentation, thoughts and sharing about your submitting your work for Portfolio Review and having one reviewer respond “… there has already been an Ansel…” and questioning in a blunt bigger-picture kind of way, “Where’s Cole Thompson’s work? Who is Cole Thompson?”
In writing, if we duplicate someone else’s work we are warned of plagiarism. Yet, in the foundations of learning, we learn by duplicating, by example and then we ultimately take flight. There is so much in between, but the length of the process and journey are different for each person. Some fly and soar immediately. Others crash and burn. Some, take a little more time, smell the roses and appreciate every step of the way.
I like your approach and thought process to find what ultimately pleases and works best for you. I believe that we are influenced by so many things and have to deal with so many variables, emotions, interests, environment, distractions, life and so on … that in any given profession, it is difficult to have individuality or be known, especially as a photographer or artist.
Being inspired from others works can be distracting, but is dependent upon how you are influenced by it. Do you see something that you want to duplicate? Or, do you see something that is a lost piece to a puzzle that you have been trying to finish? As like a race horse, do you require a blinder so that you are not distracted from finishing the race? Or, are you able to finish the race without blinders?
Discipline, focus and ability to perform to the levels that we seek … it is all a process. Who is the ultimate judge of you? Who do we answer to? Is it a client? Or, a reviewer in Santa Fe? Is it for the money? Is it for praise? Is it for a job? The Q’s & A’s can go on and on.
In many ways, I personally find myself going through what you are going through … and also … keep my eye open for discovering something new.
January 23rd, 2010 at 2:37 pm
Glad to find your blog.
I think copying a style is good for the learning process. I tried to recreated many images from my favorite masters (and not only “photography” masters, few of my works were inspired by painters as well, such as Hopper)
At some point, you stop following their root and try to find your own words.
January 26th, 2010 at 6:29 pm
Imitation really works to develop technical skills. By copying a variety of artists you learn to not only identify, but accomplish different techniques and skills. However once these skills are mastered or at least understood personal direction and style needs to be found. Kudos Cole.
January 29th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
If one has ever looked at any other photographic work, those images and styles will stay in the mind for many, many years. I can still find myself being influenced (guided) by images I saw while studying photography in community college, 22 years ago. I think the key to making great images in a personal context is to be consistent with a style and approach. And make it clear to the audience that “this is who I am and this is how I see the world.”
January 29th, 2010 at 7:32 pm
I think you are doing a good thing Cole. I believe the best way to achieve an inner vision is to have a clear mind. It is impossible to totally clear your head of images and concepts, but not looking at other people’s images for a while should help. Whatever helps you get to where you want to go is the best way to proceed.
February 1st, 2010 at 5:27 pm
I think you’re doing the right thing by not copying and by limiting what work you see. For some photographers, seeing a lot of work brings them inspiration and that’s great but, on the flip side, there’s also a lot of copy work out there.
Where I live, in Austin, it’s very competitive, there are a lot of photographers. There are some photographers who do little more than copy work-they lack imagination and can’t bring anything original to the medium. After a few years of doing this, they learn to churn out work and sort of “kid themselves” into thinking it’s great (original) work. I’d hate to be in that position. It’s much, much better (IMHO) to be an original of yourself than a sort of “poor man’s copy” of somebody else. Sure, there are some photographers who can incorporate elements of what they see, or maybe be inspired rather than copy, but, if you don’t fall into that group, it’s probably better to force yourself to be original, rather than risk producing work that’s not completely honest. Yes, you’ll miss out (maybe) on seeing some great work by hiding from it, but, in the end, you’re work will be more honest and personal. IMHO, if it isn’t personal, it isn’t worth doing.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:06 pm
CarolsLittleWorld: I agree, I’d rather be a second rate original than a first rate copy.
Cole
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:16 am
How did “Ansel” put it? A sharp image of a fuzzy concept….or was it the opposite?
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:19 am
Either way gets the point across, Gerry.
February 5th, 2010 at 11:47 am
Cole: I have enjoyed going thru (not done) your photos, blog and website.. I have found myself in recent years on the digital and equipment bandwagon if I may say that. Too wrapped up in the machine and not enough in the journey and finish product. Always wanting some latest thing of this or that, thinking it would make me better. I was an avid Ansel Adams follower back in the day and have enjoyed a good photo book along the way. I just want you to know that this blog and particularly this thread has given me a new beginning and started me in a new direction for using what little talents I have in photography. I have appreciated all the comments here and I feel refreshed and invigorated. Many thanks to you and your responders if I may say so…… best regards, Pete
February 7th, 2010 at 5:41 am
It is difficult indeed not to cross the line between inspiration and copy I guess, especially as you pointed out the unconscious process of it. But quid of the pleasure of looking at others’ magnificient work? of learning? sharing? experiencing? understanding? I know that sometimes when I take pictures I feel like I am doing something that has already been done and that I don’t add anything to it much but I still take a lot of pleasure composing these photos and capturing a special moment in time! I guess that one of the good thing is that no pictures can be done twice
and eventually one will find his/her own style (or not 
…
February 20th, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Thank you Cole I was sent your site by a fellow enthusiast from our photo club,nice work but your point about not looking at others work for awhile hit a cord.I’m a relative new comer on the amateur photography scene and enjoyed some large success too quickly now I find myself in a creative slump.Thinking to find that creative spark in viewing others work I have spent many hours on the web.Your commentary has led me back to myself..no sense in re inventing the wheel when the seeds are within ourselves.Thank you and aloha chris
February 22nd, 2010 at 7:17 am
Cole, I wanted to pass on this link, as the images shown speak to this topic. The work shown in this link is so blatant, that it cannot be anything but intentional plagiarism. This photographer needs some celibate time in the monastery- just not Mont St. Michel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT4zITGJ3v8